Actually, if real-world currencies are mapped via contract to being
Agoran currencies, there *IS* a reporting requirement:
The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity (if any)
defined as such by, and bound by, its backing document. That
entity's report includes a list of all instances of that class and
their owners.
And:
Any information defined by the rules as part of a person's report,
without specifying which one, is part of eir weekly report.
And:
1. If any task is defined by the rules as part of that person's
weekly duties, then e SHALL perform it at least once each week.
If any information is defined by the rules as part of that
person's weekly report, then e SHALL maintain all such
information, and the publication of all such information is
part of eir weekly duties.
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 07:43 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > > Ok don't freak out now, but you have exactly $8,008,135 by the way.
> >
> > Do we have to CoE this to stop it self-ratifying? Or can we ratify an
> > Agoran legal fiction that G. has that much? Would an actual bank acknow
> > ledge the resulting self-ratification?
>
> If we infer that the laws of the U.S. are a "contract" by Agoran
> definitions of Contract, we could actually infer that U.S. dollars were
> a contract-backed Agoran currency, and therefore subject to self-
> ratification. But (by recent judgement), what ratifies is the complete
> list of currency holdings (everybody's dollars). So upon a CoE, the
> recordkeepor would be required to provide a listing of everybody's
> dollars.
