What was the scam? On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The zombie thing wasn't an immediate response to that part of the scam. > TBH, I'm really really tired (I've got a cold at the moment), and I missed > the fact that there was even a scam to start with, thinking instead that it > was just that it was just somehow too easy to pay for things. I have no > clue how I did that, I must have just glanced over the text without > actually reading it. However, the zombie problem still exists, because > right now e could monopolize all zombie auctions and eventually get a > dictatorship. It should be near impossible to get a full dictatorship even > with an infinite wealth scam (a win would be fair, however). I was worrying > about zombies already too, and these were my thoughts after the scam you > pulled off a few days ago. The thing about things being to cheap was > definitely a misapprehension on my part in this case, though I there's > still some general truth to it. Sorry everyone for the mess up though. > > -Aris > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:52 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> >> >> This scam was due to the pay bug and could have been done (sorta) >> with contracts too, right? >> >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: >> > It's clear that zombies are way to powerful and need to be weakened >> > substantially. Proposed restrictions: >> > >> > - 1 zombie per player max >> > - Zombies can be deregistered by announcement after a month as zombies >> > >> > -Aris >> > >> >> >>
-- >From V.J. Rada
