On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
At least that was the direct and specific intent when I wrote it - I intended illegal actions on behalf of zombies to fail because they weren't "allowed", therefore blocking the CAN in R2466. Intent doesn't always mean much, and I can see that the link to R2466 isn't abundantly clear, but that "allows" in R2466 should definitely be considered in this context.
Such an automatic platonic failure means that recordkeepers need to do complicated assessments of the illegality of actions, and I thought avoiding that was a major reason for making illegal actions SHALL NOT instead of CANNOT in the first place.
Greetings, Ørjan.
