Proposal 7941, "HTML Scrubbing", by Alexis. [1] It passed [2], and was implemented. [3]
I seem to be digging through my proposal archives a lot lately. I haven't published them, partly because the proposals aren't in a structured format. Would it be helpful if I published the raw archive somewhere? I probably wouldn't update it all that often, and I wouldn't be able to guaranty accuracy, but at least the data would be available for the historical record. -Aris [1] It was part of that one 20+ plus item distribution. https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08449.html [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08503.htm [3] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discussion@agoranomic.org/msg40722.html On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote: > *Is that so? I think I do remember that, actually.* > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > >> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> >> Side note: would anybody be against my report being formatted as an HTML >>> table, as long as I also provided a plain text version of the email (as a >>> MIME alternative)? The rules require my report to be in plain text, but one >>> could argue it doesn't prohibit the report from being in another format as >>> well. I won't do it if people are against it, but I think it would help the >>> people who view Agora in an email client with a fixed with font. (Side side >>> note: if you have this problem or want more up-to-date information, use the >>> online report!) >>> >> >> I don't think you can. Some time last year (or was it the previous), >> people got so fed up with messages looking extremely different for >> different people that a proposal was voted through to ask the Distributor >> to strip away HTML alternatives and auto-convert to plain text if there >> wasn't any already. >> >> Greetings, >> Ørjan. >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
