That still has the problem of delaying proposals by an additional 4 days,
which is the exact opposite of what we want to do with controversial ones.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 17:44, Nicholas Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's always Agoran Consent. We can make it a trivial ratio, such as 1.1.
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds fine to me.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 at 22:48, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Last time we did this, 3 players created a contract so that anyone
> > > could act on their behalf to get the support automatically. This
> > > needs objections or the proposal Economy is completely devalued.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's a lot better for what its trying to do actually.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:07 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Proposal: Supportive Proposals (AI=1)
> > > > > {{{
> > > > > Amend Rule 2445 by replacing "Without Objection" with "With 3
> > Support".
> > > > > }}}
> > > > >
> > > > > This is intended in part to make the cycle faster, rather than
> > adding 4
> > > > > days for a free proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Alexis
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
