Yes, that's exactly what I said. You don't have to, but a lot of that report is informal anyway, so do whatever.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:41 PM, ATMunn <[email protected]> wrote: > Rule 2138: > "The ADoP's report includes the following: > > The date of the last change (if any) to each office's Officeholder. > The current status of the ongoing election for that office or, if there > is no ongoing election for that office, the date on which the last election > ended > For filled elected offices, whether or not the holder is interim." > Election statuses are required by this rule. However, it does say "ongoing > election for that _office_". I'd take that to mean that I don't need to. > > > On 11/13/2017 9:30 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> Nah, you only need to track ongoing elections for an office. And an >> office this is not. Whether or not you include it, your choice. Most >> of your weekly reports is optional info. >> >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:29 PM, ATMunn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hm. What should I do at this point? I want to publish my report, but I >>> don't >>> know whether to include the election status in it or not. >>> >>> >>> On 11/13/2017 9:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for catching this, I was about to publish my ADoP report. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't think the CoE/Response stopped anything. >>>> >>>> By R107, a CoE only invalidates a Decision if the Initiation Notice >>>> lacks something on items 1-4 in Rule 107, and it looks like you got >>>> them all. (it doesn't work like the normal CoE/response cycle). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
