> On Sep 9, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> Nope the text for CAN is this: " >> >> CAN: Attempts to perform the described action are successful.". That's >> all. So this is just mirroring that. If you want to make an argument >> that you can do anything with a CAN in private, sure. > > Hm so searching for CAN... > > Rule 2431 doesn't seem to restrict where specifications can be made.
"With Agoran Consent" is sufficient to restrict this to being done via the public fora, because rule 1728 specifies that an action with that constraint can be done by announcement (“thereby allows em to perform the action by announcement if…”). > Rule 103 doesn't seem to say how the Prime Minister can appoint a Speaker. > > Rule 2451 doesn't require announcement of Cabinet Orders themselves, nor for > assigning emself as judge (the other two options have publishing requirements > elsewhere). > > Rule 2495 is unclear on what needs to be public. Less so than you’d think, by the same coin, but there are some unbound CANs here. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
