Nope the text for CAN is this: " CAN: Attempts to perform the described action are successful.". That's all. So this is just mirroring that. If you want to make an argument that you can do anything with a CAN in private, sure.
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > No. No no no no no. No. > > CAN isn't successful either, UNLESS THERE'S A BY ANNOUNCEMENT. > > The problem ISN'T SHALL and CAN. It's the missing "by announcement". > That's what the CFJs say. > > You've just said "if it says MAY, attempts to do it *are successful*. > Even if done in Discussion. Even if done in private. Even if done > in your head. In a high-level definition. > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> Title: Mother, May I? >> AI: 3 >> Amend rule 2152 by replacing "MAY: Performing the described action >> does not violate the rules." with "MAY: Performing the described >> action does not violate the rules and attempts to perform the >> described action are successful" >> >> I submit and pend the above paying 1 shiny. >> >> >> -- >> From V.J Rada >> > > -- >From V.J Rada
