> > On Sep 8, 2017, at 12:29 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We'd have to wind back all transactions with agora to the point where > > agora's balance would have been positive... does that make CFJs and > > proposals pended with money invalidly pended and called?
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > No, because CFJs are non-binding and we can ratify without > objection facts, in contradiction to CFJs. Well, if those CFJs weren't CFJs, technically it messes up the CFJ record (CFJ numbers and everything), and those don't ratify. In the past, we've had a small handful of CFJs turn out to be not-CFJs for technical reasons like this (never a big batch at once though). Typically, if the subject of the CFJ has nothing to do with the problem itself, we "by custom" just shrug and respect the judge (or rather, the not-judge) because it doesn't invalidate eir work to call the result "a new game custom" rather than "CFJ precedent", no real difference there. If we *really* feel bothered, out of "sportsmanship" again someone might re-call the CFJ, the Arbitor will give it the same number, assign it to the same judge, and expect that the judge will cut and paste their previous result. That's fine for the contents of the judgement, but it *does* invalidate all of the rewards claimed for judging in this case.
