> On Sep 8, 2017, at 12:37 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > >> On Sep 8, 2017, at 12:32 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 8, 2017, at 12:28 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If stamp creation is found by the CFJ to be invalid, what happens? >> >> I start invalidating transactions that either affect stamps or decrease >> Agora’s balance, until I find a solution that leaves Agora with a positive >> balance at all times, and which leaves zero stamps existing. >> >> I’m actually experimenting with that right now. The results, so far, aren’t >> too bad: no proposals disappear, for example. > > Here’s what I’ve got:
That list was invalid. It passed below zero balance several times. 2017-07-30 ! nichdel created a stamp 2017-08-21 ! o claimed reward for three reports 2017-08-21 ! o created a stamp 2017-08-21 ! ais523 created a stamp 2017-08-23 ! o claimed a Welcome Package for K 2017-08-23 ! 天火狐 created a stamp 2017-08-24 ! K deregistered 2017-08-25 ! G. claimed a Welcome Package 2017-09-04 ! P.S.S. created a Stamp 2017-09-04 ! ais523 created a Stamp 2017-09-04 ! o created a stamp 2017-09-04 ! Aris created a stamp 2017-09-05 ! ais523 bought a stamp from o 2017-09-05 ! nichdel created a stamp 2017-09-07 ! V.J Rada claimed a reward for ADoP 2017-09-07 ! Gaelan destroyed all Stamps 2017-09-07 ! Gaelan paid CuddleBeam This appears to be more valid, though I’ll still need to sanity-check it. Notably, several rewards which I had previously thought would be invalidated are instead permitted. I’ve still avoided breaking any proposals or CFJs, but given the duration, I can only attribute that to the AP system taking up most of the slack. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
