Someone just pend an AI=3 proposal with the text
"Create a new power 3 rule called "Spend spend spend", with the text
{{When a shiny is spent, it is transferred to Agora}}"On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Aris Merchant <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote: >>> >but is there anything the prohibits spending >>> >shinies below 0? >>> >>> Yes, it's like the 1st sentence of assets. You can't go below 0 shinies. >> >> Thanks! >> >>> Anyway ordinary meaning of spend enforces common sense here. >> >> It's reasonable to say that ordinary meaning says the shiny is >> no longer available to whomever spent it. >> >> But why does the "ordinary meaning" mean the shiny goes to Agora? >> >> The actual rules definition (for AP) is that the AP is removed >> from the game entirely. When something is "spent", by common >> language, it's no longer useful. So I'd say that "common language" >> tells us that when you spend something, it's spent and gone - >> not back in Agora's hands. Since that's the definition for "spent" >> for AP, why doesn't it apply to shines? > > Actually, that's not a bad outcome: > > "In circumstances where another asset would be destroyed, an > indestructible asset is generally transferred to Agora, subject to > modification by its backing document and the intervention of other > rules." (Rule 2166, Assets) > > So the person tries to destroy it and it goes to Agora instead. > > -Aris -- >From V.J Rada
