Which precedent, where? Also, Agoran precedent isn't really "a reason why things happen". It's more a way to decide among the competing rule interpretations, as people keep pointing out to me when the file motions to reconsider my CFJs. :)
-Aris On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:30 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I believe this clearly fails because of precedent. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Aug 3, 2017, at 2:57 AM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Sorry sorry sorry. But the rules do textually allow me to do this, > > although I am sure the rules will be construed by the already pending > > CFJ to obviously not allow me to do this because it would be silly. > > But I can't not *try* > > > > I intend in the next sentence to have every player win by apathy, > > without objection. > > > > Every player wins by apathy. > > > > -- > > From V.J Rada > >
