On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 16:57 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > > Sorry sorry sorry. But the rules do textually allow me to do this, > > although I am sure the rules will be construed by the already pending > > CFJ to obviously not allow me to do this because it would be silly. > > But I can't not *try* > > > > I intend in the next sentence to have every player win by apathy, > > without objection. > > > > Every player wins by apathy. > > I was actually planning to try this, just for myself, just before the > fix proposal (if any) passed, on the basis that it couldn't hurt and > might get me a free win. > > As such, this can be seen as a fairly effective counterscam (a win > isn't really something worth aiming for if it happens to everyone at > once).
Is anything worth aiming for when anyone can ratify anything by announcement?
