On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 19:19 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > I agree with this carding. CuddleBeam has repeatedly shown that e > cares neither about the feelings of the other players, nor about the > interests of the game. As the player who spoke most strongly in eir > support when this whole mess started, I believe this obligation falls > on me. I intend, with 2 support, to Throw the Book at CuddleBeam.
Huh, I just read what a Red Card actually does, and it feels fairly minor for what's described as one of our largest punishments. Being unable to effectively vote for one voting cycle is a fairly short punishment. IIRC back when we had the Chokey, the most similar former punishment I'm aware of, it halved voting power for a month. Several other systems would have created negative assets that required expending positive assets to get rid of. Of course, in these days of Referee fiat, it's possibly for the best that we don't have any particularly punishments. Perhaps we can change that once criminal justice reform goes through. (Note that this isn't to say that I believe CuddleBeam deserves a larger punishment in this particular case; there are way bigger potential breaches than this one, so the relatively small punishment that's being applied in this particular case seems reasonably proportionate and fair.) -- ais523
