On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 15:24 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> I'd prefer to spend a CFJ slot be spent but it's not an urgent CFJ at all. >> I'm be up for retracting it if you pledge that you'll resubmit it when the >> CFJ queue is empty enough (and if the economy eventually makes CFJs have a >> price, I'll refund you). > > Why would I do something like that? I was hoping to avoid a CFJ > altogether in order to avoid a judge having to waste eir time on > explaining yet a gain why such a ridiculously implausible scam doesn't > work. Delaying it wouldn't really help at all; there isn't a judge > shortage, just a shortage of tolerance for that sort of nonsense. > > However, if you won't take it from me, I can find an uninvolved judge > who will, I'm pretty sure, just reiterate the point that everyone else > has been making. I was just hoping to avoid the effort for everyone > (and the permanent embarrassment it'll create in the CFJ records). > > -- > ais523
I'd be happy to knock it out today, assuming Cuddlebeam doesn't bar me as soon as e sees this message. -grok
