CFJs aren't really that powerful. They're guidelines, not legally binding. If the guideline is absurd everyone ignores it.
On Jul 8, 2017 06:25, "Cuddle Beam" <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, but the Arbitor could then CFJ "I've gotten Pink Slipped" and judge > it as FALSE. > > What would happen then? > > (I believe CFJs supercede what people percieve things to be - for example, > if you think that something should be interpreted one way and me another, > if a CFJ to solve it appears and it falls in your favor, I would need to > act with necessary hypocrisy (I dont have a better word for it, where > "behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel") and act > from then on as if the gamestate was according to the CFJ's verdict, due to > the perspectivism there is on Agora's reality. The idea is to subject > everyone to that hypocrisy via (troll, but valid, due to perspectivism, > except nobody is the holder of that perspective. And even then, nothing > stops people from being dishonest in Judgements anyway, there just wouldn't > be any lulling of the audience via rhethoric in the troll case) CFJs. > Although, it feels like I shouldn't be able to.) > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> A pink slip is issued to you and someone takes your spot. >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> > On Jul 8, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > What would happen in the following case (and has it been tried before?) >> > >> > I'm Arbitor for example, and then CFJ "I've achieved victory and won >> every ribbon" and then assign it to myself and judge it as TRUE, for bogus >> reasons. >> > >> > I'd likely get that challenged and get carded, but what if I then CFJ >> "There is no reconsideration/Moot/etc applicable to that CFJ and no >> applicable cards, nor have any cards been granted to Cuddlebeam lol" and >> then assign it to myself and judge it as TRUE. >> > >> > But then someone could say, "Yeah, that's silly, what about ' an >> absurdity that can be concluded from the assumption that a stateme-'" >> > >> > SHUSH! I as Arbitor CFJ "There is absurdity in my CFJs and Judgements" >> and then I assign it to myself and judge it as FALSE! because PANCAKES. >> > >> > "...." >> > >> > "You're not treating Agora Good Right For-" >> > >> > SHUSH! I as Arbitor CFJ "Cuddlebeam is treating Agora Right Good >> Forever extremely well" and then I assign it to myself and judge it as >> TRUE! because MORE PANCAKES. >> > >> > etc etc etc >> > >> > Basically use the power that CFJs have to alter the gamestate to >> enforce any gamestate you want and if someone tries to stop you - CFJ it >> away. Would be absurd, yeah but, CFJ: "is it absurd?"... FALSE. >> > >> > >> > >> >> >
