No, because someone else would have become the arbiter already OR the referee issues their report and it self-ratifies. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 8, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, but the Arbitor could then CFJ "I've gotten Pink Slipped" and judge it > as FALSE. > > What would happen then? > > (I believe CFJs supercede what people percieve things to be - for example, if > you think that something should be interpreted one way and me another, if a > CFJ to solve it appears and it falls in your favor, I would need to act with > necessary hypocrisy (I dont have a better word for it, where "behavior that > contradicts what one claims to believe or feel") and act from then on as if > the gamestate was according to the CFJ's verdict, due to the perspectivism > there is on Agora's reality. The idea is to subject everyone to that > hypocrisy via (troll, but valid, due to perspectivism, except nobody is the > holder of that perspective. And even then, nothing stops people from being > dishonest in Judgements anyway, there just wouldn't be any lulling of the > audience via rhethoric in the troll case) CFJs. Although, it feels like I > shouldn't be able to.) > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > A pink slip is issued to you and someone takes your spot. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Jul 8, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What would happen in the following case (and has it been tried before?) > > > > I'm Arbitor for example, and then CFJ "I've achieved victory and won every > > ribbon" and then assign it to myself and judge it as TRUE, for bogus > > reasons. > > > > I'd likely get that challenged and get carded, but what if I then CFJ > > "There is no reconsideration/Moot/etc applicable to that CFJ and no > > applicable cards, nor have any cards been granted to Cuddlebeam lol" and > > then assign it to myself and judge it as TRUE. > > > > But then someone could say, "Yeah, that's silly, what about ' an absurdity > > that can be concluded from the assumption that a stateme-'" > > > > SHUSH! I as Arbitor CFJ "There is absurdity in my CFJs and Judgements" and > > then I assign it to myself and judge it as FALSE! because PANCAKES. > > > > "...." > > > > "You're not treating Agora Good Right For-" > > > > SHUSH! I as Arbitor CFJ "Cuddlebeam is treating Agora Right Good Forever > > extremely well" and then I assign it to myself and judge it as TRUE! > > because MORE PANCAKES. > > > > etc etc etc > > > > Basically use the power that CFJs have to alter the gamestate to enforce > > any gamestate you want and if someone tries to stop you - CFJ it away. > > Would be absurd, yeah but, CFJ: "is it absurd?"... FALSE. > > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
