On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > No, I'm not missing it. It's literally a claim that there was an error, and > e did so. So e expressed a doubt through the method of claiming there was > an error > which is exactly what the rule says the method consists of (claim of error > isn't > even capitalized, while capitalization is generally inconsequential, it's > support > for it being a naturalistic thing that is done naturally by a claim that > there is > an error, not a term of art).
Do you think a CFJ that points out an error in a report would thus also be a CoE, then (and thus create a duty to decline, correct, create a CFJ, or cite a CFJ; I assume you'd just cite the CFJ that was just made)? -- ais523
