On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 02:50 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > As Secretary, it is my pleasure to report that Agora has paid the
> > following salaries to players:
>
> CoE: This first attempt at making the report was inaccurate (and was
> withdrawn by its author). See the second attempt for details on what
> was wrong.
>
> (This message brought to you by the fact that being withdrawn by its
> author is not enough to prevent a message self-ratifying. In the
> future, try CoEing your own reports if they're wrong.)
o used the phrase "it inaccurately describes payments made to former
players." when e withdrew eir report.
This was a clear claim that the document was in error.
This was clearly "an explicit public challenge via one of the
following methods, identifying a document and explaining the scope and
nature of a perceived error" (R2201)
The words "claim of error" don't actually need to be used to make it one.
In fact, by labeling "Claim of Error", you're technically using the same
ISID that you said yesterday didn't work for me (i.e. claiming that you
claim something, rather than just claiming it).
