CFJs are judged on their truth value at call time. On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:35 CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This may help: > http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07962.html > > >On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 19:20 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> I CFJ on these statements: > >> > >> “Any player may take the office of Rulekeepor with 2 support.” [i.e. > >> I got a pink slip] > >> “o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip to Gaelan.” > >> > >> I bar o from both CFJs. > > >These are CFJ 3508 and CFJ 3509 respectively. I assign them to > >CuddleBeam. > > > 3509 is “o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip to Gaelan.” > which is the tit for tat CFJ which I won't give Judgement on because I won't > engage in that even if clever use of the rules command me to. > > > 3508 was TRUE back then. Now in the current context, it FALSE. > >
