This may help:
http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07962.html

>On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 19:20 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> I CFJ on these statements:
>>
>> “Any player may take the office of Rulekeepor with 2 support.” [i.e.
>> I got a pink slip]
>> “o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip to Gaelan.”
>>
>> I bar o from both CFJs.

>These are CFJ 3508 and CFJ 3509 respectively. I assign them to
>CuddleBeam.


3509 is “o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip to
Gaelan.”  which is the tit for tat CFJ which I won't give Judgement on
because I won't engage in that even if clever use of the rules command
me to.


3508 was TRUE back then. Now in the current context, it FALSE.

Reply via email to