On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> Bah.
>
> I retract “Judicial Reform.”
>
> I create the AI-2 proposal “Judicial Reform v2” by Gaelan, Aris and Quazie
> with the following text: <
>
> Amend R991 “Calls for Judgement” by replacing the last paragraph with {
>
> “Judge Status” is a player switch tracked by the Arbitor in eir monthly
> report, with valid values of “Narrow” (default) and “Wide.” A player may
> flip eir own Judge Status by announcement.
>
>
> When a CFJ has no judge assigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any player to be
> its judge by announcement, and SHALL do so within a week, but CANNOT do so
> if fewer than 2 days have passed since the CFJ was initiated. The players
> eligible to be assigned as judge are players except the initiator and the
> person barred (if any) who fulfill one of these requirements:
>
> 1. Eir Judge Status is set to Narrow, and they have publicly declared
> Interest in the CFJ.
>
> 2. Eir Judge Status is set to Wide, and they have not publicly declared
> Disinterest in the CFJ.
>
> The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested players
> have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. If a CFJ has no judge
> assigned, then any player eligible to judge that CFJ CAN assign it to emself
> Without 3 Objections.
>
>
> If there are no eligible judges for a CFJ for a period of 2 weeks, any
> player CAN judge it as DISMISS with 2 days Notice.
>
> }
>
> For all players who have been assigned a CFJ within the past 2 weeks, flip
> their Judge Status to Wide.I'm preparing my promotor report. Going through this again, I see some small errors. Specifically, you use "they" when you should use "e". I wouldn't mind either in isolation, but the combination feels wrong, and the latter form is preferred. -Aris
