On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > And lots of the other things G. mentioned earlier in this thread. >> > > [No distinction between quoted and unquoted parts, whatsoever, in either > version] > > A minor suggestion from an observer: you could use slightly kinder language >> on those dismissal ideas. Like DISMISSED WITHOUT STANDING if a CFJ has no >> apparent or impending impact on the game state, and DISMISSED WITHOUT >> EVIDENCE if the caller or another player do not provide enough evidence or >> argument to adjudicate. >> > > Someone nuke gmail headquarters, please. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. I did write that message on mobile--happily willing to blame my phone assuming this email looks correct.
