On Tue, 30 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > If the judiciary calms down, or we get lucky enough that G. comes back > and wants eir post
I think splitting the "assigner" and the "recordkeepor" is a good split to keep, whether informally or formally (I plan to keep up the recordkeeping for a bit, anyway). Maybe the assigner could become a "fun" office, with expanded powers as well as duties, to make it a plum position (and then picking a judicial assignment method would actually be an election issue in exchange for the powers). On Tue, 30 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > How would people feel about reimplementing a formal criminal and civil > court system in addition to CFJs? It's not bad in principle, but this (or suggestions for public defender, etc) requires yet more officers. That would be my only concern, I like the idea of official true/false arguments! The main issue in the past with the criminal and civil systems was just time - by the time you let plaintiff, defendant, judge all respond in a timely fashion at each step, everyone's kinda sick of the case or half- forgotten it and moved on. And - for civil court especially - wait until you've established some good steady value for your fungible tradeables, otherwise figuring out what's "equitable" is nigh-impossible (pretty hard even with that).
