I would be happy to help clean up the data and/or run a parser if you could explain what is needed?
---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > We can start by importing the annotations we already have. I already have > those parsed in some form (see GitHub.com/AgoraNomic/ruleset), though I > probably need to clean up the data first. I haven't parsed the garbage bin, > but that shouldn't be too hard. > > Gaelan. > > > On May 19, 2017, at 1:23 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> Currently our CFJ data is a bit duplicated between the Rulekeepor's and > Arbritor's records. I think it would be optimal if we did things like this: > >> > >> - Summary field on (some) CFJs in the CFJ database similar to how they > are listed in the FLR now. > >> - Field in either the CFJ or ruleset database linking rules to relevant > CFJs. > >> > >> My FLR script could then automatically pull the descriptions of the > relevant CFJs from the database, > >> this would simplify adding CFJs, and remove the necessity to keep a > Garbage Bin around in the FLR. > > > > This kind of handshake is *exactly* what I was thinking would be nice > yesterday. > > > > However, I tried yesterday to look at a small handful of CFJs, and it's > a LOT of > > work to write summary sentences that generalize well enough to be a > Rules annotation, > > especially if I need to note what Rules are involved. > > > > One step is to encourage Judges to include Rule/version in their text > whenever they > > cite a Rule (e.g. "According to Rule 101/34..."). Would make for easy > cross-refs. > > > > > > >
