We can start by importing the annotations we already have. I already have those parsed in some form (see GitHub.com/AgoraNomic/ruleset), though I probably need to clean up the data first. I haven't parsed the garbage bin, but that shouldn't be too hard.
Gaelan. > On May 19, 2017, at 1:23 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> Currently our CFJ data is a bit duplicated between the Rulekeepor's and >> Arbritor's records. I think it would be optimal if we did things like this: >> >> - Summary field on (some) CFJs in the CFJ database similar to how they are >> listed in the FLR now. >> - Field in either the CFJ or ruleset database linking rules to relevant >> CFJs. >> >> My FLR script could then automatically pull the descriptions of the relevant >> CFJs from the database, >> this would simplify adding CFJs, and remove the necessity to keep a Garbage >> Bin around in the FLR. > > This kind of handshake is *exactly* what I was thinking would be nice > yesterday. > > However, I tried yesterday to look at a small handful of CFJs, and it's a LOT > of > work to write summary sentences that generalize well enough to be a Rules > annotation, > especially if I need to note what Rules are involved. > > One step is to encourage Judges to include Rule/version in their text > whenever they > cite a Rule (e.g. "According to Rule 101/34..."). Would make for easy > cross-refs. > > >
