I would support that proto-proposal with the suggested edit. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > Just back from vacation myself. I'llll assign it to you in a bit. > > (if I can figure out what case number we're on and so forth) so > > feel free to just work on the arguments... > > Thanks! So if people would care to start submitting arguments for > consideration, that would be appreciated. I'll look for precedents of > course, but if anyone has some that might be favorable to their side, > they should of course present them. > > > Proto: > > All CFJs of the form "[X] is[is not] a Player" are automatically > > assigned to the player other than X with the most recent > registration > > date. > Suggested edit: "...to the eligible player...". To avoid contradictions. > > -Aris >
