I guess the CFJ rules have enough checks and balances that this at least leads to an initial judgement. It has the potential to put complex cases directly on new players (the case of Ying and yang Corp comes to mind) - but maybe that's fine? I support this proto proposal. On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 06:56 Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But Murphy has a vested interest here - so it doesn't quite cover all > bases > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 06:19 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: >> > I'd like this CFJ. I'll look up the procedure for taking it, if no one >> minds. Most active players are ineligible or have a conflict of >> > interest. >> >> Just back from vacation myself. I'll assign it to you in a bit. >> (if I can figure out what case number we're on and so forth) so >> feel free to just work on the arguments... >> >> -G. >> >> Proto: >> All CFJs of the form "[X] is[is not] a Player" are automatically >> assigned to the player other than X with the most recent registration >> date. >> >> >> >>
