On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > Just back from vacation myself. I'llll assign it to you in a bit. > (if I can figure out what case number we're on and so forth) so > feel free to just work on the arguments...
Thanks! So if people would care to start submitting arguments for consideration, that would be appreciated. I'll look for precedents of course, but if anyone has some that might be favorable to their side, they should of course present them. > Proto: > All CFJs of the form "[X] is[is not] a Player" are automatically > assigned to the player other than X with the most recent registration > date. Suggested edit: "...to the eligible player...". To avoid contradictions. -Aris
