> On Dec 5, 2016, at 5:59 AM, nichdel <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/05/2016 04:36 AM, ais523 wrote >> So it now costs shinies to pend proposals, but nobody will have any >> until 2017 (possibly later, if it turns out that the Secretary's powers >> to award shinies are buggy; the "if doing so is specified by a rule" is >> fairly vague). >> >> I can think of several ways out of this situation, but just in case >> things go badly wrong, I think it would be prudent for Alexis to hold >> onto eir dictatorship a little longer. >> >> -- >> ais523 > Assuming the remaining bits work, this could be eased by either temporarily > over-riding the mechanism or by immediately rewarding everybody shinies this > month (my preferred method). > > We should probably also grant the promotor the ability to pend 1 or so > proposals a month without paying, to prevent complete dry spells (especially > once the economy gets more usages) and ease the concerns voiced when the > proposal was distributed.
Seems to be moot anyways, everyone’s got some Shinies now - enough to pend two proposals each. Good catch for any future proposals to expand the Shinies system, though. I’d be on board with an escape hatch, for example if the cost to pend a proposal is greater than the number of Shinies held by any player. -o
