On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:16 AM ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
a) You posted this to a-d. b) We have some precedent that attempting to distribute a typo-ed proposal leads to the Promotor submitting the proposal immediately before distributing it, in which case both proposals are valid (and the new one should therefore probably have a new number). I have no idea if that precedent still holds under the current ruleset. The original distribution would then still be invalid as it had an incorrect author. -Alexis
