On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 01:12 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > [As pointed out on a-d, my original distribution contained incorrect > text, rendering it invalid. I'm afraid everyone's going to have to > re-cast their votes. Sorry about the mix-up.]
a) You posted this to a-d. b) We have some precedent that attempting to distribute a typo-ed proposal leads to the Promotor submitting the proposal immediately before distributing it, in which case both proposals are valid (and the new one should therefore probably have a new number). I have no idea if that precedent still holds under the current ruleset. -- ais523
