On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:31 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A tad unrelated, but just to bring up one of my ideas that's been siting > around for a while... What does everyone think about bringing back criminal > cases in some way? Obviously not if the situation is uncontested, (I think > there have always been exemptions, or perhaps alternate procedures for > that) but more CFJs should make things interesting. The current system > feels like it's mostly intended to make sure the officers do their jobs, > but it would be nice to bring back other form of rulebreaking, and > generally make things more interesting. Especially if we get an economy. I > have a new system I should be bringing out for comment soon (take that with > a grain of salt, if not several of them. Some of my ideas have been in that > stage for weeks) which may also add more offenses. (I think what I'm thing > to say with all this is that our system works best for rules we actually > want people to follow) > > > At the moment I think you appeal cards by initiating inquiry cases into > the validity of the card. But again the carding system is pretty weak, and > even worse, boring. I was thinking of turning the ref into a prosecutor, > while also allowing others to bring cases. I don't know why we ever got rid > of these cases, and I'm too lazy to dig through the archives and check. If > someone knows (or is willing to check) we can fix whatever went wrong last > time. > > > -Aris > That's sort of going the opposite direction to what I was thinking, which was along the same lines of making rulebreaking more relevant, but making the Referee the adjudicator rather than the prosecutor. -Alexis
