On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:10 PM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: >> I thought (and Wikipedia agrees) that IRV stages without a majority winner >> (which includes any with a top tie) choose (one or more) losers, not a >> winner. > > Ah, yes. Thinko. >
Honestly, IRV is so well-defined that I don't think we need an explicit explanation of it in the rules. I am out of pends for the week, but H. Promotor, is it possible that we can rush this proposal through once corrected so that it can apply to the Silver Quill? -scshunt
