On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > My Next Big Idea was Officers' Policies: > > 1. Loosen up Rules restrictions on Officers. Allow Promotor to > decide which proposals to distribute for example, as long as none > sits for longer than (say) 3 weeks. CotC more flexible in appointing > judges (I added that a bit already). Assessor has flexibility in > how to award Voting Strength Tokens. Etc. > > 2. An Officer's Policy is like a pledge. E can publish eir system > for determining proposal distribution (or whatever). It can be > corrupt (bribes for distribution) or fair. If e wins the election that > becomes eir Policy, which e must abide (or change with some number of > objections). Policies could also have asset creation authority (if > assets still exists, no big deal if not). > > 3. Policies become mini-games with substantial power for the officer, > and the subject of electoral politics. > > (This is just the direction I was thinking; not asking you to propose > or incorporate this!) > > -G.
Do you want to write the first draft of this? It's your baby.
