On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 18:33 +0000, omd wrote: > That it ignores the AI=1 requirement is accidental, but probably not > important. If someone makes an obviously deficient fast track > attempt, that's what a Claim of Error is for.
Sure, I just don't have a feel for how likely it is that skilled Ridering or inattentiveness might allow a high-powered rule to get through, hence "worrisome". You think it's very unlikely, I take it?
