On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 10:06 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > I wrote: > > > To the best of my knowledge, if democratization succeeded, then TRUE > > because exactly 1 vote per player was effective; if it failed, then > > FALSE because none of omd's attempts reported both Walker's and > > woggle's vote counts correctly. > > So: Was democratization indeed blocked by a Gerontocracy? Why or > why not? (I've lost track of these details.) >
On another note, is there any reason why it wouldn't be democratizable right now? We could try to democratize it again. (Also, do the voting limits matter, given that nobody attempted to cast more than one vote?) -- ais523
