============================== CFJ 3397 ==============================
proposal 7568 passed.
Proto-judgement:
Relevant events:
Mon 5 Aug 2013 22:48:45 -0400 omd attempts to distribute, covering the
possibilities that the Chamber is Ordinary, Green, Red, or Purple
Sat 24 Aug 2013 21:41:01 +0100 ais523 attempts to democratize, possibly
ineffective due to Gerontocracy
Sat 24 Aug 2013 16:47:38 -0400 omd attempts to resolve, reporting votes
as follows:
FOR: ais523, G., Ienpw III, Machiavelli, omd, Roujo, scshunt,
Walker, woggle
PRESENT: OscarMeyr
The normal vote detail block reported 1 vote per player (though F/A
still said 29/0), with extra attempts up to resolve it with a
report a fixed 1/2/3/4 votes per player.
Votes:
Walker: FOR
G.: FOR (via promise)
scshunt: if 'endorse ais523' and 'endorse omd' would evaluate to the
same thing then that, etc.
ais523: FOR
Ienpw III: FOR (endorse ais523)
woggle: FOR * 1
Machiavelli: FOR
omd: FOR (Tue Aug 6 02:51:15 UTC 2013 "I vote FOR 7583-6")
Roujo: FOR (Wed Aug 7 14:14:23 UTC 2013 "same votes as ais523 did on
proposals 7548-7586")
PRESENT: OscarMeyr
OscarMeyr: PRESENT (Wed Aug 7 13:21:53 UTC 2013 "7548-7586, I vote
ENDORSE Murphy")
To the best of my knowledge, if democratization succeeded, then TRUE
because exactly 1 vote per player was effective; if it failed, then
FALSE because none of omd's attempts reported both Walker's and
woggle's vote counts correctly.
If anyone thinks that the resolutions may have been ineffective for
reasons not covered above, then please cite specific reasons, rather
than just falling back on "well there might have been something we
missed". Yes, there might have been, but IMO it's unreasonable to
expect the judge to dig through however many months of history
looking for such a thing without any pointers.
Also IMO: if the proposal hasn't already been adopted, then it
would suffice for the Assessor to announce "each of these players
cast the indicated vote from 1 to 100 times; regardless of the
numbers, the outcome is ADOPTED". (Yes, that would expand to 10^20
individual announcements, but it would not impose any additional
recordkeeping burdens; contrast "I CFJ 'This is Sparta' 10,000 times"
from a few years ago.)
