I'd say e remains a player with full rights to continue to play up until the moment e forfeits.
On 28 June 2013 10:50, Fool <fool1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/06/2013 8:37 PM, Steven Gardner wrote: > >> The argument (setting aside the retroactivity claim) is that Blob was >> immediately required to forfeit. Not doing so would to be sure be >> violation of the Rules, but it still can't happen unless Blob sends a >> message say that e forfeits. >> > > Okay, for the sake of argument: if he's required to forfeit *immediately*, > and instead he, for example, attempts to vote, then he's violating the > rules. Correct? > > -Dan > -- Steve Gardner Research Grants Development Faculty of Business and Economics Monash University, Caulfield campus Rm: S8.04 | ph: (613) 9905 2486 e: steven.gard...@monash.edu *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). *** Two facts about lists: (1) one can never remember the last item on any list; (2) I can't remember what the other one is.
