On Tue, 14 May 2013, Wes Contreras wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Honestly, the loss of some imagined and too-easily-reset currency is > > less onerous then the time to write an apology IMO. > > A reasonable opinion, but loss of currency is less amusing, and our > approach to the game is largely governed by amusement value. :)
Oh yes, I agree, and I'm happy to provide said amusement. My argument was on the point of don't appeal this because you think some destroying an arbitrary amount of an easily-destroyed currency is somehow a 'more deserved' punishment, because right now we have really no reasonable way to place a relative value on different kinds of punishment.
