On Tue, 14 May 2013, Wes Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this case, requesting that the appeal be
> > linked with that of 3320, given that this was clearly a more severe
> > violation yet got a lesser penalty.
>
> In levying a penalty, we considered not only the Rule violated, but
> the impact to Agora for this lapse. We strongly disagree that the
> absence of a record of Ribbons with minor changes from week to week
> holds the same importance as the very rules by which we operate the
> game.
>
> We also note that CFJ 3320 is already under appeal, so it would seem
> premature to appeal this based primarily on that comparison prior to
> 3320 having a final resolution.
Honestly, the loss of some imagined and too-easily-reset currency is
less onerous then the time to write an apology IMO.
Not that I mind either way in this case, just pointing out that
having to spend "apology time" is necessarily the cheapest way out.
I think our currency systems are far too much in flux to make any
punishments measurable at the moment, until it gets to community
service or time out.
-G.
