On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3116 > > ============================== CFJ 3116 ============================== > > If the Promise cited in CFJ 3114 were cashed by ais523, G. would > generally be found NOT GUILTY of the resulting violation. > > ========================================================================
Belated arguments: this question is not asking whether NOT GUILTY would be appropriate; it is asking whether G. would actually be *found* NOT GUILTY. It's asking how a judge, faced with this situation, would actually behave. Sounds UNDETERMINED to me. —the Page of Breath
