On 10/24/2011 06:41 PM, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3116 >> >> ============================== CFJ 3116 ============================== >> >> If the Promise cited in CFJ 3114 were cashed by ais523, G. would >> generally be found NOT GUILTY of the resulting violation. >> >> ======================================================================== > > Belated arguments: this question is not asking whether NOT GUILTY > would be appropriate; it is asking whether G. would actually be > *found* NOT GUILTY. It's asking how a judge, faced with this > situation, would actually behave. Sounds UNDETERMINED to me.
"generally" though -- it's asking for a reasonable approximation of the general trend, not a specific prediction of an individual judge.
