On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:12 PM, John Smith <spamba...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Additional arguments: You (and the people arguing in the discussion forum)
> seem to be failing to take into account the context in which the CfJ was
> called (i.e. immediately below a clearly labeled document, whose label
> matched the referent you collectively are claiming did not make sense)
Yes, but if I said
{
I am the Speaker.
CfJ: Speaker omd is a player.
}
It would not be TRUE just because I am a player and it's clear what I
was referring to-- I'm still not the Speaker.
