On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 4:04 PM, John Smith <spamba...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I suggest that a Player file a Motion to Reconsider CfJ 3109. Among other > objections, the judgment is inconsistent with the judge's arguments. All > information necessary to render a judgment of TRUE or FALSE is public, and > the statement makes precise sense even after determining that the document > "Victory Condition of Being Bucky" is not a Victory Condition.
Mr. Smith, the statement is nonsensical because referring to the Victory Condition of Being Bucky, without quotes, implies that there is such an entity that is a Victory Condition.
