Good, then. I wasn't aiming for a huge mess - I only realized it was when Walker reminded me that /someone/ would have to sort it all out. I'm glad it was invalidated, actually. =)
Oh well. It was interesting. (^_^) ~ Roujo On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Wooble wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Jonathan Rouillard >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If possible, for each Proposal that I can vote on, I ENDORSE the last >>> person that will have voted on it when the voting period ends unless >>> that person is me, in which case I ENDORSE the previous voter. >>> If this isn't possible, I ENDORSE the first person to have voted after >>> the Proposal's Author. If there is none, or if that person is me, I >>> ENDORSE the Proposal's Author. >> >> I transfer a non-existent prop from Roujo to Murphy because wtf. > > Apart from being nullified by an overly broad disclaimer anyway, I think > this would just collapse down to "for each proposal, I endorse the last > person other than me to vote on it" - which wouldn't be that bad, I > would have just set it aside and processed it after the voting periods > ended. It would *potentially* be more complex if it ended up needing to > interact with retractions and/or similarly complex conditional votes. >
