On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:15 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 23:04 -0500, omd wrote: >> > Making incorrect statements is one issue. Attempting to ratify them is >> > another. I don't think they're the same crime, and indeed, you could be >> > punished for both. >> >> Pretty damn similar: if I hadn't intended to ratify the document, >> publishing it and claiming it was true wouldn't be a R2215 violation >> even if the document were false because it wouldn't be game-relevant. > > Arguments, CFJ 2926a: > > If one person had published a knowingly incorrect document and claimed > it was true, and a different player had attempted to ratify it (also > knowing it was incorrect), and the document itself was a statement about > the effects of the Agoran ruleset, which (if either) would violate > R2215? Which (if either) would violate R2202? To me, the only sane > answer is that the first would violate R2215 but not R2202, and the > second would violate R2202 but not R2215, because the two illegal > actions are entirely separate. Presumably you have something else in > mind?
Well, it depends on whether the idea of the document being ratified is considered excessively hypothetical.
