ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 16:04 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:49 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>> However, scams SHOULD NOT >>>> be carried out which are detrimental to the game as a whole. >>> >>> This last sentence is broken, because it applies even on days other than >>> April 1. (A similar scam was used to win BlogNomic recently.) >> >> You're uncomfortable with the rules suggesting that you not destroy >> the game even if it's not April 1? > > Although it's a laudable restriction, I'm uncomfortable with what looks > like an attempt to slip in a rule in a mostly unrelated proposal (in > this case, a restriction that always applies as part of a rule that > almost entirely only applies on one date). (Possibly still reeling from > that shock BlogNomic win; for the curious, the exploited rule in > question was "The Anarchist with the highest RIOT score on June 1st 2010 > has achieved victory. If multiple Anarchists are tied for the highest > RIOT score then they have all achieved victory. If no-one has declared > victory by 12 noon on June 1st 2010, then all Anarchists have achieved > victory." If you don't know the loophole already, try to spot it!)
<rot13>Gur frpbaq fragrapr nccyvrf ng nyy gvzrf.</rot13>
