On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 13:28, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Players are encouraged (in the ordinary-language sense) to take >> advantage of these definitions to carry out scams which would be >> illegal or impossible on other days. However, scams SHOULD NOT >> be carried out which are detrimental to the game as a whole. >> > Don't you mean MUST NOT? (given the redefinition)
Nah. The redefinition allows all sorts of dangerous/detrimental scams through, and those should still not be okay. In normal circumstances, I wouldn't like such a subjective requirement, but it's the flipside of the general loosening.
