Kerim Aydin wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: On or about 22-Mar 2010, CFJ 2777 was assigned to G.
I bar Taral.  I set the II to 2.

After time (say, after a few days) it becomes reasonable to expect G. would
become suspicious, and it would be reasonable to expect em to make an
effort to ensure e could receive messages by emailing the distributor,
or asking via BAK what was up.  As it happens, e started to wonder what
was up around March 24-25, but didn't really worry about acting on it
until Taral's message on March 27 [see evidence]. But for at least a couple days, including the time of the message, it would be unreasonable to expect em to act. This suggests (either via R101 rights or R478) that the message wasn't sent "via" the public forum at all.

I suggest that CFJ 2777 was assigned to G. around March 24-25, when e began to suspect that something was up. Specifically, the messages sent *to* the list on 22-24 Mar were sent *via* the list in immediate succession as soon as it became reasonable to expect all the desubscribees to make the effort to ensure they could receive messages.

Pavitra

Reply via email to